————————————– —————— ——————
Company Ticker Net revenue EBITDA Net income
USD mln yoy USD mln yoy mgn USD mln yoy mgn
——————- ——————- —————— ——————
Kharkivoblenergo HAON 261.4 32% 33.2 85% 13% 9.6 48% 4%
Odesaoblenergo ODEN 276.3 35% 24.0 73% 9% 0.6 n/m 0%
Sevastopoblenergo SMEN 48.8 23% 8.9 55% 18% 4.2 52% 9%
Sumyoblenergo SOEN 81.5 25% 14.5 83% 18% 7.3 246% 9%
Vinnitsyaoblenergo VIEN 90.6 32% 13.8 240% 15% 5.0 433% 6%
————————————– —————— ——————
Alexander Paraschiy: Kharkivoblenergo’s relatively low net income increase is explained by a USD 10 mln rise in D&A expenses. Sevastopolenergo’s bottom line growth beat our expectations: we expected only a moderate increase in the company’s EBITDA and net income (refer to our July 2008 report). We also highlight Vinnytsyaoblenergo, which restructured its USD 54 mln in outstanding payables, eliminating its bankruptcy risk.